The following post was written by Barry Sackin of Sackin & Associates.
When we last checked in, the future of Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR) was uncertain. We have some clarity now following private meetings with both House and Senate staff during the SNA Legislative Action Conference. The House Education and the Workforce Committee would very much like to move on CNR, which is now two and a half years past due. That said, their docket is pretty full and the Chairwoman, Virginia Foxx (R-NC), has no active plan in play. And don’t forget, the full House has quite a lot on their plates, too.
On the other hand, the Senate Agriculture Committee has clearly stated they have no intention of addressing child nutrition during this full session of Congress. That means no action before 2020. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) is Ranking Member of the committee and has said she is done with this issue for now. And don’t forget, it took until late April to have the new Secretary of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue, confirmed and sworn in. The committee still has more than a dozen confirmations to address when (and if) the White House nominates candidates, and there doesn’t seem to be an urgency to do so.
In March, Senate Agriculture Committee chairman Pat Roberts (R-KS) sent a letter to the USDA saying that the issues with school meals were created by the USDA through the regulatory process. He mentions that the issues can be resolved the same way, without Congressional action.
And that is what we're seeing now. At the start of his second week as Secretary, Mr. Perdue, with Senator Roberts by his side, held a press event at a school in Leesburg, VA (the school district administered by SNA president Becky Domokos-Bayes) where he issued a proclamation announcing a forthcoming interim regulation to expand and extend flexibility in school meals. Here is what he proposed:
This represents a significant accomplishment for SNA, which has been asking for this flexibility for several years.
It must be pointed out that the Secretary’s announcement is not without controversy. The nutrition community and anti-Trump forces are painting these reasonable actions as a roll-back of President and First Lady Michelle Obama’s efforts to improve nutrition. The modest flexibility does not “roll back” strong nutrition standards, but recognizes the negative impact that some parts of the new meal patterns has on student acceptability, participation, and costs to the meal programs.
We'll be sure to provide another update when the interim regulation is published.
About the author